Social Media Is Not Without Its Risks

The dust hasn’t even settled on the James Patrick situation.  We haven’t heard the last of that yet

Now we have another absolute travesty of justice (justice?) or so it would seem.

It seems as though the wrong man has been sacked for being a Twitter user.

I’m not familiar with either of the Account Holders, but that doesn’t mean it should be ignored.

If the blog STOP STIGMA is to be believed, an Avon and Somerset Police Officer has been sacked for being Twitter User @TheBritishCop.

I don’t know the true identity of either person, nor if they are even known to each other, but I suspect not.

The full story, together with various links, can be found on the above blog.  The main problem, however, is that the Professional Standards Department of Avon and Somerset Police have allegedly conducted a disciplinary hearing and ignored the fact that the officer was not the correct one.

The head of A&S Professional Standards has allegedly been in communication with @TheBritishCop (who maintains that he is NEITHER this officer, nor even a member of Avon and Somerset Constabulary, but has for some reason omitted this vital piece of information from the disciplinary files.

If this is true then this is clearly an unacceptable situation.  Professional Standards Departments should behave in exactly that manner – PROFESSIONALLY.  They do nothing for the confidence of public or their officers if they, themselves, deviate from the straight and narrow.

Then today I find myself contacted by an officer from the Western bit of the UK who tells me that he’s under investigation AGAIN for his use of Twitter.  I have no idea what the specific issue is there but it’s making a bit of a nonsense of Police use of Twitter & other Social Media.  To be effective (in my opinion) a Twitter/SM account needs to be balanced between humourous and professional. If it’s too dry and stuffy people will disengage, but neither should it be discreditable in any way.

The Chief Constable of Avon and Somerset Police recently made much of his Force being awarded a Gold Award by Investors in People.  How does that fit with (allegedly) sacking the wrong person.  Sacking has huge repercussions for the person being sacked, even when it’s the right person.  Imagine the effect if/when it’s the wrong person.

I implore Avon and Somerset to either justify their actions and convince us that they’ve actually disciplined and sacked the right person, or re-examine this case as a matter of urgency.  One way or the other it can’t be left hanging there, and public confidence needs to be restored before too much damage is caused. It’s out there, there’s nothing you can do about that.

Finally, I do think there’s a moral obligation on @TheBritishCop to put this right, but I also understand how he/she probably fears the same fate awaits him/her if reported to his/her Force, assuming he/she really is a cop.

Advertisements

11 thoughts on “Social Media Is Not Without Its Risks

  1. I know it may seem a bit anarchic to a hierarchy, but why can’t large organisations just let a thousand SM bloody flowers bloom and be done with it, as long as no sensitive info’ is revealed.

    Give police SM users complete freedom & protection in return for a big but independently administered boot if the agreed policy is flouted.

    If policy isn’t agreed at all levels but is instead imposed, these cat and mouse games will persist and waste ever more resources in the chase.

    For policy to be mutually agreeable at all levels, it is self-defeating only for the top brass to discuss policy publicly. If staff are suppressed rather than respected, they’ll flout rules and hide from the hounds.

    Unless the service can accommodate others in the footsteps of James, also willing to discuss policy implications, yet allowed free to do so, foxhunting may as well be reprieved – with SM users all furred up for the fun and managers daily flailing against those flying from their might..

  2. The fact that Superintendent Paul Richards is head of PSD, instigated the complaint, then had private conversations with the British Cop on twitter, then deleted those messages, and then had days off instead of going to the hearing or offering any account – is one of the biggest signs of the force being totally unprofessional.

  3. There is definately a moral obligation for this to be put right, unfortunately this won’t happen. When your face doesn’t fit any longer the Police will stop at nothing to get that officer out. The hearing on Tuesday 8 April proves that. Another excellent police officer has lost his job and his life as been destroyed.

  4. Yes, “the Police will stop at nothing to get that officer out” – especially if your MP helps to shame the top echelons by showing them up quite clearly as unreconstructed bullies.

    It’s quite obvious to members of the public that the top brass care FAR more about insubordination than for an employee or his/her “welfare”.

    “By a quirk of the rules, police offices are denied what is called “interim relief” in constructive dismissal cases, so he will cease to be paid from 6 June while he awaits his tribunal, which will not be until August or September.”

    http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmhansrd/cm140410/debtext/140410-0002.htm

    If only it were a quirk though. When a barrister in an employment tribunal case is instructed in no uncertain terms to block “interim relief” for the officer, we can only discern the spite of a thwarted child.

    http://www.channel4.com/news/met-police-stop-whistleblowers-pay

Please Feel Free To Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s